by Chris Alexander
December 1, 2012
A leader reveals his true character in how he leads. Is his result positive, or negative? Does he respect the Constitution? Does he uphold the principles in the Preamble to the Constitution? Does he honor the Symbols and Seals of our Country? Does he believe in the Rule of Law? Will he abide by all laws in our United States Code Titles, upholding his Oath of Office?
Leadership is defined as the ability to lead, but in a positive direction that will enable people to achieve positive results supporting positive attributes. Leadership sets the tone for future actions of the people that are under the delegation of authority for whoever is in charge.
Glaring examples are when Reagan was in office, the standard of behavior was respected. All government employees including the Secret Service acted appropriately in all respects. There was a good moral fiber in Reagan that precluded any event that would take place, allowing a high standard for others to follow.
Obama and his false truth backward thinking attitude and his lack of moral integrity in leadership sets a different tone. Since he has been in office their is a decaying of moral fiber in the behavior of government personel including the Secret Service. Why?
It can best be answered through exploring the backgrounds of these two different individuals. One that deserves honor and one that deserves to be tried for Treason, Sedition, and Seditious Conspiracy.
Reagan’s background exemplifies the traditional American Spirit. He was raised with a strong work ethic. He was aware of his duty to the country when he served in the military rising to the rank of Captain in the Army. His mother was instrumental in his faith development where his core belief in the essential goodness of people was developed.
Reagan believed in making the United States strong by identifying the face of our enemies. He strongly advocated the development of a Strategic Defense Initiative, that was designed to provide a missile defense from an attack. He resisted Soviet advances, unlike Obama that has given the secrets of the M3 Missile Program to Russia, similarly as Bill Clinton did with the Chinese when he was in office, violating our National Security!
Reagan believed in the preservation of private industry by legislating the largest single tax cut in American history. His conservative view would set new standards for a President, unlike Obama’s view of destroying the private sector and enslaving future generations under a blanket of debt amounting to 17 Trillion dollars.
Reagan successfully led the United States to a massive armaments program. A program that was probably responsible for the Soviets decision that they could no longer afford to compete, and were falling far behind. Thus, Perestroika was born and with it the Soviet Union drifted to dissolution.
Obama is another story! He has done the exact opposite of Reagan with disastrous results! All that was predictable due to his background. His mother was not a person that believed in God. She was the type of person that was so radical that her life was in total disarray. There was no moral anchor that was evident in her life from the fact that she was bankrupt in that respect. Her marriage to Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. was a relationship founded in adultery. Obama, Sr. was still married when he was with Stanley Durham. He never married her until late in her pregnancy, never bothering to get a divorce from his present wife, or could it be that since he was a Muslim it wasn’t necessary to get a divorce? This marriage to Stanley Durham would not be considered legal under our laws, but would according to Islam. However, under our laws Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro would be recognized as a Bastard!
Obama’s father was a drunkard that lost his legs in an auto accident. He later lost his life in a similar occurrence.
Obama’s work ethic can be seen in the fact that he never held a position other than as a a community organizer. Mayor Richard Daley had Obama and Michelle Obama doing several functions for him in Chicago that could be construed as illegal.
Obama purported the views of his mother that believed in Communism and adhered to his fathers beliefs in Islam. This background explains his belief structure and why he wants to destroy our country. His violation of our National Security was seen in his executive orders in 2009, and his speeches. He gave top secret information to the Russians concerning our M3 Missile Program. He also cancelled the Constellation Program for NASA. This will put us behind the Russians and the Chinese, erasing all the progress we gained. The other program that he cancelled was the CAPPS Program, essential to maintaining security in identifying terrorists that could board commercial aircraft.
Obama believes in the destruction of private industry when he took it over and relegated this generation, and future generations into massive debt. Obama has created more debt than any other president from the time of George Washington to present.
Obama’s massive armaments program will be in the other direction as opposed to Reagan. Obama’s appointments of Ashton Carter, the Weapons Czar, has only one policy. He wants to decrease our armaments. John Brennan, the Terrorism Czar, wants to ban the United States military. The reaction of our enemies will welcome this approach capitalizing on this mistake by reinforcing their armaments and building up their military. This will place us at an extreme disadvantage militarily, economically, politically, and personally!
Obama, Eric Holder, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, And John Esposito want the American people not to be able to recognize the face of our enemy by all that they do. Their rhetoric is to deny and not allow any semblance of violence associated with Islam. They don’t want our enemies to be referred to as terrorists, or that we are at war with Islam. They even want terrorist groups to have sensitive information relating to the training of FBI materials regarding how they identify, profile, and track, potential terrorists in the United States.
When we measure the two backgrounds of Reagan and Obama we see a marked difference. This is related to the variance of leadership perspectives and their belief structures. The choices that any leader makes relates directly to his character. Leadership is truly a window into the character of the one that leads. Comparing Reagan and Obama, reveals the elements of right and wrong based on their results. Results are measured in consideration of standards revealed in the Preamble and the Constitution.
Which one do you as an American citizen prefer and admire?
1 Timothy 3:5